[Cynnabar] A "minor" bit of censorship

[Dan Peacock]

> Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:25:00 -0400
> From: Randy Asplund <randyasplund at comcast.net>
> 
> On May 11, 2011,  at 5:07 PM, Matt Lagemann wrote:
> 
> > Also know that I cannot publish any  picture that has a recognizable  
> > minor.
> 
> 
> Wow. With no  way to even trace that minor, the SCA has sunken into all  
> new lows of  paranoid delusion. 
> Quick, where's a big, airtight box where we can all hide? Freedom is  
> out of fashion where frivolous legal liability is concerned. You can't  
> do this anymore. You can't do that either. Now you can't share a great  
> moment your kid had, or let them feel part of something. You aren't  
> allowed. But don't you feel -SAFE?
> 
> Just  sayin',
> 

<Regional Chronicler delurking from the shadows>

Believe me Good Sir, I completely understand your level of frustration.  I 
expect that the regulations may at some point relax to a certain degree (some 
already have).  That said, it is the set of regulations that chroniclers of the 
SCA are presently working under at the moment.  This is something we are 
continually discussing amongst ourselves as chroniclers.  As things are 
discussed, things change, and we hope for the better.  I've made a note of your 
sentiments and will add them to the discussion.

If there are other opinions on the subject, please let me know (both for and 
against).  I can be reached at peacocda AT yahoo DOT com.

Lord Richard vanUtrecht
Pentamere Regional Chronicler